Online survey estimates interest and knowledge in doxy-PEP for STI prevention among sexual and gender minorities, indicating a need for better access and education.
STIs are an important public-health issue that disproportionately affects sexual and gender minorities (SGM) in Latin America. Despite doxy-PEP efficacy in preventing syphilis, chlamydia, and gonorrhea, its use remains little studied in the region. This study aimed to estimate interest in, prior knowledge of, and use of doxy-PEP among SGM in Brazil, Mexico, and Peru. Online cross-sectional survey (Aug–Dec/2024) of participants aged ≥ 18 years, recruited via apps and social networks. We included people designated male at birth who identified as cisgender men, travestis, transgender women, or nonbinary/other. Three outcomes were analyzed: interest in, prior knowledge of, and use of doxy-PEP. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with knowledge. Among 15,797 participants (Brazil: 10,119; Mexico: 4,019; Peru: 1,659), interest in doxy-PEP was high (88%), but only 37% reported prior knowledge and 7.2% reported prior use. Knowledge was higher in Mexico (53%), followed by Brazil (33%) and Peru (26%). Greater knowledge was associated with higher education (aOR = 1.21), ≥ 5 partners in the last 6 months (aOR = 1.32), current or prior PrEP use (aOR = 2.76), living with HIV (aOR = 1.83), greater HIV knowledge (per-point aOR = 1.20), and recent stimulant use (aOR = 1.20). Age > 30 years (aOR = 0.88) and higher internalized LGBT-phobia scores (aOR = 0.98) were associated with lower knowledge. Interest in doxy-PEP was greater among younger, non-White people living in capitals, with multiple partners, engaged in transactional sex, using stimulants, on PrEP, or living with HIV. Prior use was more frequent in Mexico (9%) and Peru (8.4%) than in Brazil (6.3%). In Brazil, all users reported medical prescription and, in most cases, adequate adherence. Despite high interest, knowledge and use of doxy-PEP remain low and uneven across countries, reflecting structural barriers and the absence of regional guidelines. Prevention strategies should prioritize accessible information, integration with PrEP services, and community-based approaches to ensure greater equity in the STI response among SGM in Latin America.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: