A cross-sectional study assesses HPV vaccine awareness and uptake in women attending cervical screening, indicating low rates and significant demographic influences.
Evidence shows HPV vaccination reduces infection, precancer and cervical cancer, yet coverage in health-resource-limited of China remains uncertain. We assessed awareness, uptake and correlates among women attending cervical screening, and examined associations with screening outcomes. We conducted a cross-sectional study in eight county sites in 2023-2024 among women aged 35-64 y. A standardized questionnaire captured sociodemographic factors, awareness and vaccination. Cervical samples were tested for hrHPV. Outcomes were awareness, vaccination, hrHPV, HPV16/18 and CIN2+. Associations were estimated using modified Poisson models with site fixed effects and HC3 robust errors. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and covariate-standardized marginal estimates were reported. We included 93,027 unique participants. Awareness was 45.15% and vaccination 6.73%. hrHPV prevalence was 11.38% and CIN2+ detection was 0.70%. In 2024 versus 2023, awareness was lower (40.66% vs 51.34%) while vaccination was higher (7.61% vs 5.53%; aPR 1.25, 95% CI 1.18-1.32). Awareness and uptake declined with age; coverage was 23.23% at ages 35-39 and 0.29% at ages 60-64. Urban residence and higher education were associated with uptake (urban aPR 1.19, 95% CI 1.11-1.27; bachelor's or higher aPR 1.73, 95% CI 1.58-1.90). The age-by-year interaction was significant, with standardized gains concentrated at ages 35-49. Vaccination was associated with lower HPV16/18 infection (aPR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.85) but not with overall hrHPV or CIN2+. HPV vaccine awareness and uptake were low among women aged 35-64 y in health-resource-limited areas, with strong age, educational and urban-rural gradients and marked site heterogeneity. Uptake increased in 2024, mainly at ages 35-49, and vaccination was associated with a lower prevalence of HPV16/18 infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: