Investigation demonstrates rice husk ash enhances brick properties, indicating sustainability in manufacturing.
This study investigates rice husk ash as a partial replacement for clay in sustainable brick manufacturing. Seven brick compositions were developed with rice husk ash contents of 0%, 5%, 7%, 9%, 11%, 13%and 15% by weight. The bricks were evaluated through compressive strength testing, water absorption analysis, shrinkage measurement and efflorescence examination. Results show that bricks containing 5% rice husk ash achieved compressive strength of 4.82 MPa, representing only a 5.3% reduction compared to conventional clay bricks. This performance exceeds the minimum requirement of 3.50 MPa specified in NBC 109–1994 for structural applications. Water absorption increased progressively from 22.81% in pure clay bricks to 38.65% at 15% rice husk ash content. This increase creates opportunities for specialized applications in permeable infrastructure and thermal insulation systems. Shrinkage decreased by 51.3% at maximum rice husk ash content due to the non-plastic nature of ash particles. This significant reduction enhances dimensional stability during manufacturing and addresses a critical quality control challenge in the Nepalese brick industry. The study establishes a practical application framework that categorizes rice husk ash bricks into three performance tiers. Bricks with 0–5% rice husk ash are suitable for load-bearing structural applications. Compositions with 5–7% rice husk ash meet requirements for non-load-bearing partitions. Bricks containing 9–15% rice husk ash are appropriate for permeable pavements and thermal insulation systems. These findings demonstrate that rice husk ash integration represents a technically viable and environmentally beneficial approach that transforms agricultural by-products into construction materials while advancing circular economy principles in the building materials industry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: