In-vitro measures compare delivery efficiency of dornase alfa in cystic fibrosis using breath-actuated and continuous nebulizers, suggesting improved output with the former.
RATIONALE: Pulmozyme® is indicated in the management of cystic fibrosis to improve lung function and is typically delivered by continuous nebulization to tidal-breathing patients. During the exhalation phase medication is discharged into the environment. Breath-actuated nebulizers (BANs) only operate during inhalation. This study was designed to evaluate medication output from a BAN configuration (AeroEclipse®-XL/Ombra® compressor (AE-XL); TMI) compared with a continuous nebulizer configuration (PARI LC-plus®/PARI Boy®SX compressor (LC+)). METHODS: Each nebulizer was filled with a 2.5 mL Pulmozyme® ampoule (1 mg/mL dornase alfa) and run until onset of sputtering. Aerosol was captured by a filter at the mouthpiece, and the nebulizer connected to a breathing simulator (tidal volume = 600 mL; duty cycle = 33%; rate = 10 cycles/min). Fine droplet mass (µg < 5.4 µm diameter (FM pulm )) and fine droplet fraction (% < 5.4µm, (FMF pulm ) were determined by Next Generation Impactor operated at 15 L/min with assay for dornase alfa by HPLC. RESULTS: Device (n=10) FMFpulm (%) FMpulm (μg) AE -XL / Ombra 83.3 ± 2.2 428 ± 40 LC+ / Pari Boy SX 83.8 ± 2.2 349 ± 62 CONCLUSIONS: The AE-XL BAN exhibited a little higher delivery of Pulmozyme® to the LC+, although well within the demonstrated patient tolerability (Pulmozyme® Nebuliser solution SPC, Roche). In addition, clinicians should be aware that, unlike the LC+, the operation of the BAN only occurs due to patient inhalation thereby eliminating nearly all fugitive emissions and ensuring delivery to the patient at their own pace.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suggett et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: