Introduces a framework that enhances knowledge retrieval accuracy in language models, suggesting improved outcomes in information retrieval.
Large language models and retrieval-augmented generation systems treat all knowledge as uniformly persistent, ignoring a well-established property of information: that different types of knowledge expire at fundamentally different rates. This paper introduces the Dynamic Epistemic Decay Framework, a formal multi-dimensional theory that characterizes knowledge validity as a function of five independent decay dimensions: temporal decay (πππ‘π‘), paradigm decay (ππππ), uncertainty decay (πππ’π’), dependency decay (ππππ), and zero decay (ππ0). We implement this framework as a four-phase retrieval pipeline and evaluate it on the TempQuestions benchmark (n=1,740) against three baselines: standard cosine similarity, BM25 lexical retrieval, and naive recency ranking. Decay-weighted retrieval achieves 92.1% accuracy versus 13.5% for standard semantic retrievalβa 78.6 percentage point improvementβwith zero regressions on stable factual queries. On semantically complex temporal benchmarks where lexical heuristics fail, the framework dominates a more resourced BM25 baseline (90.2% vs 1.6% on date-bounded role queries). Epistemic modulation (Phase 4) and dependency graph reasoning (Phase 3) further demonstrate correct mechanism behavior on specialized benchmarks, validated via proof-of-concept implementation. Unlike temporal KG completion approaches that require structured annotation, and unlike contrastive training approaches to time-sensitive RAG, the decay framework is training-free and operates directly over unstructured text corpora. We argue that the decay framework completes the separation of concerns that RAG began: decoupling not just factual storage from model parameters, but factual currency from both.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alan Kochukalam George (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: