Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A community-based study assesses immunization coverage in urban and rural Jaipur, highlighting critical disparities.
Introduction: Childhood immunization coverage in India has improved nationally, yet urban-rural disparities persist, particularly in rapidly urbanizing states such as Rajasthan. Urban slum populations often face significant barriers, including limited mobility, restricted access to essential services, and vaccine hesitancy. Objective: To assess and compare the full immunization coverage among children aged 6-23 months in urban and rural areas of Jaipur district, Rajasthan. Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2023 to March 2024 in the rural (Dadiya) and urban (Jhalana) field practice areas of RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur. A sample of 711 children aged 6–23 months was selected using the WHO 30×7 cluster sampling method. Immunization status was verified using vaccination cards and caregiver history. Data were analyzed using SPSS v22.0 with descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. Results: Full immunization coverage (FIC) was significantly lower in urban areas (82.0%, 95% CI: 77.2–86.1%) compared to rural areas (92.3%, 95% CI: 89.5–94.5%) (p<0.001). Dose-specific analysis revealed a higher dropout rate for later vaccines, including Pentavalent 3 (urban 81.7% vs. rural 91.8%) and Measles (urban 85.0% vs. rural 93.2%). Conclusions: Rural Rajasthan’s ASHA-led model achieved near-universal FIC, whereas urban slums experienced systemic barriers leading to higher dropout rates for later doses. Targeted interventions, such as slum-focused microplans, extended service hours, and urban community health workers, are urgently needed to reduce disparities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: