Spatial analysis investigates walkability in Dubai's CityWalk districts, suggesting design improvements.
Dubai’s emerging “CityWalk” districts are part of a wider shift in urban policy towards open-air, mixed-use, pedestrian environments in hot–arid cities, but their spatial performance as walkability interventions remains under-examined. This study investigates how street–network configuration supports neighbourhood-scale walkability, accessibility, and potential social vibrancy in three pedestrian-oriented CityWalk developments in Dubai—City Walk, The Walk and Al Seef. Building on earlier typological work, we adopt a space syntax approach and use DepthmapX angular segment analysis to quantify angular connectivity, integration (R800), and total depth (R800) within an 800-m walking catchment. City Walk, embedded in the inner–urban grid, exhibits the highest internal connectivity and neighbourhood–scale integration. The Walk shows a linear, axis-dominant configuration with moderate integration and the lowest average depth, concentrating accessibility along a single waterfront boulevard. Al Seef’s heritage-inspired fabric combines a moderately connected waterfront spine with sikkas and cul-de-sacs that favor localized movement, producing a more articulated integration pattern. The analysis demonstrates a consistent relationship between higher connectivity, lower depth, and enhanced spatial legibility, and clarifies how distinct CityWalk configurations generate specific movement potentials in a hot–arid metropolis. For planning practice, the findings highlight differentiated design and regulatory strategies for grid-based, linear waterfront and heritage-inspired CityWalks and underpin a syntax-based framework for evaluating and planning more walkable and potentially more socially vibrant CityWalk districts in Dubai and comparable Arabian Gulf urban contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kordi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: