PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 20260 citations

Getting the Best of “Unwanted Recognition”

View Full Paper
APAndrea Pető

Key Points

  • The research investigates how anti-gender campaigns affect Gender Studies and broader academic freedom in Europe.
  • Analyzed the case of Central European University and its challenges with Gender Studies.
  • Evaluated the impact of illiberal state policies on scientific communities and discourse.
  • Discussed resistance strategies within academic networks.
  • Gender Studies was removed from Hungary's accredited programs, forcing CEU to relocate.
  • Political narratives changed Gender Studies into 'popular science' lacking proper expertise.
  • Illiberal states misuse neoliberal practices, reducing international standards in scientific publishing.

Abstract

This article examines systematic attacks on Gender Studies as part of broader anti-gender campaigns within illiberal states, using the personal experience at Central European University as a case study. When Gender Studies was deleted from Hungary’s accredited study list in 2017 without consultation, CEU was forced to relocate from Budapest to Vienna in 2020, demonstrating how attacks on academic freedom occur within EU member states rather than distant authoritarian regimes. These attacks transform Gender Studies into “popular science”, where politicians and public intellectuals make authoritative statements without relevant training, paradoxically occurring during renewed public trust in scientific expertise following the pandemic. Illiberal states exploit neoliberal evaluation systems, replacing international peer-reviewed journals with pro-government local publications and reorienting scientific discourse from the Global North toward Russia and China — a twisted form of decolonization that reduces democratic inclusivity. The article argues that European scientific infrastructure remains unprepared for illiberal scientific institutions that appear legitimate but operate fraudulently using neoliberal language of excellence and impact. Resistance strategies include finding alternative sites for knowledge production, redefining scholarly identities, constituting support networks, and mobilizing internationally.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Andrea Pető (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba422e4e9516ffd37a2364https://doi.org/10.61095/815-0047-2026-1-150-154
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1What makes you hopeful for gender studies in Hungary, in the world?2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2The War on Universities: Illiberal Tactics in Turkey, Hungary, and the United States2026
  3. 3Populists’ struggle for epistemic hegemony and anti-gender attacks on higher education in authoritarian contexts: the case of Turkey2024 · 9 citations
  4. 4Knowledge Production, Academia, and 'Anti-Gender' Mobilisations2026
  5. 5Making Gender and Sexuality Studies Illegal: Heteronationalism, Anti-gender Mobilization, and the Neoliberal "Utopian" Gaze in Bulgaria, 2018–20232024 · 5 citations