Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critical analysis reveals how accounting theory evolves with practice, indicating ongoing refinements in the field.
A critical analysis of practice is not the only basis for a good theory. Nor must theory be completely applied to a practical situation in order for it to be considered good theory. A body of thought which may be developed from accounting practice and which is logical in all respects may be said to be derived largely from practice. But it must be compatible with the purposes of accounting and it must not be in controversy to other aspects of accounting. "Developments" in accounting theory and practice refer, primarily, to the degree to which accounting theory and practice is disclosed and applied. Perhaps it is more important to consider such developments as referring to the application to practice of latent theory, the discarding or revision of old theory, or the evolution of new theory. In any case, the existing theory would be available for continued application in practical situations to the extent considered appropriate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roland Funk (1950) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: