Key result
Elevated baseline cDPP3 fails to predict 180-day clinical outcomes in acute heart failure.
Why the study?
Does elevated baseline cDPP3 (≥40 ng/mL) predict adverse clinical outcomes or correlate with congestion relief during GDMT optimization in patients with acute heart failure?
Cohort (n=1,068)
Yes
Does elevated baseline cDPP3 (≥40 ng/mL) predict adverse clinical outcomes or correlate with congestion relief during GDMT optimization in patients with acute heart failure?
In patients hospitalized for acute heart failure without overt shock, circulating DPP3 levels are only mildly elevated, are independently associated with MRA use and Black ethnicity, and do not serve as an independent predictor of 180-day adverse clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elevated cDPP3 lacks prognostic value in acute HF without shock; leaves open its role in cardiogenic shock or as a modifiable target.
INTRODUCTION: Circulating dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (cDPP3) is implicated in cardiocirculatory failure and elevated concentrations predict poor outcomes in shock states. Its role in acute heart failure (AHF) is unexplored. We assessed the clinical relevance of cDPP3 in AHF. METHODS: Analyses were performed using two prospective AHF trials: STRONG-HF and CORTAHF. cDPP3 was measured at baseline and follow-up (day 90 in STRONG-HF; day 30 in CORTAHF). Associations with 180-day (STRONG-HF) and 90-day (CORTAHF) outcomes were evaluated according to baseline concentrations. Longitudinal changes during guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) optimization and predictors of elevated cDPP3 were analysed. RESULTS: In STRONG-HF, 222/973 patients (23%) had cDPP3 ≥ 40 ng/mL. These patients were younger (58 ± 15 vs. 65 ± 13 years, P < .0001), more frequently female (47.7% vs. 35.8%, P = .0013) and Black (42.8% vs. 14.4%, P < .0001), with lower NT-proBNP concentrations (P < .0001). Baseline cDPP3 ≥ 40 ng/mL was not associated with 180-day outcomes. Over 90 days, cDPP3 decreased by -15% with high-intensity care and -8% with usual care (P = .078). Changes in cDPP3 were not associated with NT-proBNP reduction (continuous P = .797; ≥30% responder P = .990). In pooled multivariable analysis, MRA use was independently associated with cDPP3 ≥ 40 ng/mL (OR 3.83; 95% CI 1.47-9.96; P = .006), whereas non-Black ethnicity was associated with lower odds (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.29-0.64; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: In AHF, cDPP3 was mildly elevated and was not associated with clinical outcomes or congestion relief during GDMT optimization. Elevated cDPP3 identified a distinct clinical phenotype but did not confer adverse prognosis.
Bruno et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute Heart Failure (n=1,068). Elevated baseline cDPP3 (≥40 ng/mL) vs. Baseline cDPP3 <40 ng/mL was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality or HF readmission through 180 days (STRONG-HF) (Not significantly associated with outcomes, p=0.57). In patients with acute heart failure, elevated baseline cDPP3 ≥ 40 ng/mL was not significantly associated with 180-day clinical outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: