This review identifies gaps in research on how auditors formulate opinions on financial statements, suggesting further exploration is needed.
ABSTRACT: This paper reviews auditing research on the process by which auditors form their opinions on financial statements. A structure for this research is provided to organize the review and to provide insights into areas where research is needed. This structure is obtained by cross-classifying steps in theory development and steps in the opinion formulating process. While several important lines of research have begun, the primary conclusion is that a great deal of potentially important research has not been performed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Felix et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: