Comment discusses a mathematical error in warranty cost analysis, implying need for accurate formulations.
The article presents information on comments made by Franklin Lowenthal on the article "Product Warranty Period: A Markovian Approach to Estimation and Analysis of Repair and Replacement Costs," by K.R. Balachandran, R.A. Maschmeyer and J.L. Livingston. Lowenthal has said that the article by Balachandran, Maschmeyer and Livingston [1981] contains a mathematical error. The conclusion that the exponential distribution is the only distribution that leads to a failure rate constant during the warranty period is certainly correct. However, the mathematical formulation of the postulated condition of time independence as expressed in Equation (3) on page 117 in that paper is incorrect. The incorrect equation expresses a quite different but exceedingly fundamental concept of probability theory: independence of events. In fact, the word "independence," which generally refers to independence of events, is used by the authors immediately prior to their incorrect equation. A reader who attempted to combine the incorrect Equation (3) and correct Equation (1) would be led to an incorrect conclusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Franklin Lowenthal (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: