The ILLUMINATE study demonstrates QVA149 improves lung function in COPD patients on LABA/ICS, suggesting better treatment options.
Introduction The ILLUMINATE study evaluated the superiority of the once-daily QVA149 110/50µg, a dual bronchodilator combining the LABA indacaterol and the LAMA glycopyrronium, compared to twice-daily LABA/ICS, salmeterol/fluticasone 50/500µg (SFC), in terms of efficacy, safety and tolerability in patients (pts) with moderate-to-severe COPD. This analysis reports the efficacy and safety of QVA149 vs. SFC in the sub-group population using fixed-dose LABA/ICS prior to study enrollment. Methods 122 pts on LABA/ICS prior to study entry were randomized to QVA149 (n=54) and SFC (n=68). FEV 1 area under the curve for 0-12h (AUC 0-12h ), pre-dose trough FEV 1 , rescue medication use, exacerbations and safety were assessed after 26wks. Results QVA149 significantly improved FEV 1 AUC 0-12h , pre-dose trough FEV 1 and reduced rescue medication use in COPD pts regardless of previous LABA/ICS use at study entry (Table). Number of exacerbations (QVA149: 23; SFC: 41) and pts with incidence of adverse events (QVA149: 50%; SFC: 55.9%) was numerically lower with QVA149. Treatment difference, QVA149 vs. SFC Parameter Pts with LABA/ICS prior to baseline (n=122) Overall pt population (N=522) Wk 12 Wk 26 Wk 12 Wk 26 FEV 1 AUC 0-12h , mL 180(34)* 160(38)* 120(16)* 140(19)* Pre-dose trough FEV 1 , mL 140(35)* 150(40)* 90(17)* 100(19)* Rescue medication use, puffs/day -0.56(0.34) -0.71(0.34) # -0.28(0.16) -0.39(0.17) # *p<0.001; # p<0.05 Conclusion In the subpopulation previously treated with LABA/ICS, QVA149 demonstrated significant improvements in lung function and rescue therapy use compared to SFC. These results were consistent with the overall study population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mezzi et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: