Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 18, 2026The Accounting Review

Behavioral Implications of Taxation: A Reply.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

DCD. Larry CrumbleyUniversity of Florida

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Author replies to critiques about ex ante and ex post distinctions in tax behavior research, suggesting integration is necessary.

Key Points

  • This article addresses critiques regarding the distinction between ex ante and ex post research in taxation behavior.
  • Response to comments on the original article, emphasizing the semantic nature of differences.
  • Discussion of the integration of ex ante and ex post methodologies in tax research.
  • Reference to the 1973 AAA's classifications of tax research types.
  • Clarification that behavioral research can encompass both ex ante and ex post approaches.
  • Agreement on the indistinct boundaries in tax research methodologies.
  • Identification of two main types of tax research: compliance and analysis.

Cite This Study

D. Larry Crumbley (1974) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba432b4e9516ffd37a42c9https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-4492110
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Behavioral Implications of Taxation: A Comment.1974
  2. 2Committee on Federal Income Taxes.1974
  3. 3A Perspective on Experimental Tax Research.1995
  4. 4Report of the American Taxation Association 1985-86 Committee on Tax Research Methodology.1987
  5. 5Behavioral Implications of Taxation.1973