Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis explores braiding between syntactic processes and anaphoric relations in English and Japanese, indicating important grammatical implications.
Two syntactic processes in Japanese and English which involve deep-structure binding of pronouns, namely relativization and thematization, can interfere with the operation of later cyclic or postcyclic rules of pronominalization in a relationship we refer to as ‘anaphoric bleeding’. This shows that the anaphoric relations which hold between NP's within a clause are not only a result of the internal syntactic structure of the clause, but also the result of the external grammatical function of the clause as a whole within the larger containing sentence. We show, furthermore, that some phenomena associated with deep-structure binding invalidate the approach to relativization inherent in Perlmutter's ‘shadow pronoun’ hypothesis and Schachter's ‘promotion’ theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akmajian et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: