Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
March 18, 2026The Accounting Review

Evaluations of Accounting Journal and Department Quality.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

RWRichard P. WeberWSW. C. Stevenson

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Evaluates journal quality in accounting, suggesting improvements to department assessments based on publications.

Key Points

  • The aim is to identify and clarify assumptions in ranking accounting journals and departments based on perceived quality.
  • Analyzed previous studies on accounting journal rankings.
  • Assessed journal quality evaluations for relevance.
  • Considered publication frequencies in leading journals.
  • Revealed questionable assumptions in earlier evaluations.
  • Provided a framework for more effective department assessment.
  • Identified discrepancies in perceived versus actual journal quality.

Cite This Study

Weber et al. (1981) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba43584e9516ffd37a4810https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-4491994
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Perceptions of Journal Quality.1974
  2. 2Attitude Measurement and Perceptions of Accounting Faculty Publication Outlets .1983
  3. 3Faculty Perceptions of Journal Quality: An Update.1990
  4. 4A Comparison of Published Accounting Research and Qualities of Accounting Faculty and Doctoral Programs.1975 · 1 citations
  5. 5Leading Accounting Departments Revisited.1978 · 1 citations