Mixed-methods study evaluates training impacts on competency and confidence in OTs and CPs delivering VR.
Background Delayed return-to-work is common after serious injury. Vocational rehabilitation (VR) supports people to return to/remain in work. We developed training for occupational therapists (OTs) and clinical psychologists (CPs) to deliver a VR intervention (Return to Work After Trauma-ROWTATE) to UK trauma patients within a large-scale randomised controlled trial. Objectives Evaluate the training, OT/CP competence and confidence to deliver ROWTATE, attitudes/confidence in evidence-based practice (EBP). Methods Competency was assessed through Team Objective Structured Clinical Examination and two tasks (management plan, employer letter). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) estimated inter-rater reliability. Questionnaires measured EBP attitudes (EBPAS-36) and confidence (EPIC) pre and post-training and confidence in ROWTATE delivery post-training. Semi-structured interviews captured training experiences and confidence. Results 47 OTs and 16 CPs completed training. Competency scores were high (OT range=27.5–37.5; CP range=28.5–37; maximum=38). Inter-rater reliability was moderate (OT ICC=0.56, 95%CI 0.18,0.77; CP ICC=0.73, 95%CI −0.22,0.93). EBPAS-36 scores were high pre and post-training with no significant increase post-training. OT confidence in applying evidence (P = 0.01) and evaluating effect of their actions (P = 0.04) increased significantly post-training. OTs and CPs had high confidence (80–100% across questions) in delivering ROWTATE. Conclusions VR training resulted in high competency scores, improvements in EBP confidence and high confidence in delivering ROWTATE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kellezi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: