PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 2026Journal of orthopaedic surgery0 citationsOpen Access

Associations between total and regional fat-to-muscle mass ratio with the risk of osteoarthritis: Mediating role of systemic immune-inflammation index

View Full Paper
SGShuo GeLZLei ZhangJSJixiang Shi

Key Points

  • To explore how total and regional fat-to-muscle mass ratios are associated with osteoarthritis risk, considering the role of systemic inflammation.
  • Utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999–2006 & 2011–2018).
  • Evaluated total and regional fat-to-muscle mass ratios using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
  • Determined osteoarthritis status through self-reports.
  • Employed logistic regression for association analysis between FMR and osteoarthritis prevalence.
  • Conducted mediation analysis to assess the impact of the systemic immune-inflammation index on the relationship.
  • Out of 9,504 participants, 953 (10.63%) reported osteoarthritis.
  • Higher odds ratios for osteoarthritis were identified: arms (1.122), legs (1.156), trunk (1.142), and total FMR (1.194).
  • The highest quartile of FMR significantly increased osteoarthritis risk by 75.4% for arms, 115.7% for legs, 113.6% for trunk, and 161.3% for total FMR.
  • Linear relationships were noted between leg, trunk, and total FMR with osteoarthritis.
  • The systemic immune-inflammation index mediated 2.4%–2.6% of the association between FMR and osteoarthritis.

Abstract

Background While obesity is an established risk factor for osteoarthritis (OA), the differential impacts of regional body composition is not well understood. This study aimed to examine the associations of whole-body and region-specific (arms, legs, and trunk) fat-to-muscle mass ratio (FMR) with OA prevalence, as well as the mediating effects of systemic inflammation in this relationship. Methods Data from adults aged ≥40 years were collected from the 1999–2006 & 2011–2018 cycles of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Total and region-specific FMR was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, with OA status determined by self-report. Logistic regression was used to analyze the associations between total or regional FMR and OA prevalence. Mediation analysis was conducted to determine the mediating effect of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). Results Among the 9,504 participants included, 953 (10.63%) had OA. The odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) for OA by arm, leg, trunk and total FMR were 1.122 (1.082–1.163), 1.156 (1.101–1.213), 1.142 (1.094–1.192), and 1.194 (1.131–1.260), respectively. Compared to the lowest quartile, the highest quartile of arm, leg, trunk, and total FMR had 75.4%, 115.7%, 113.6%, and 161.3% increased risk of OA, respectively. Restricted cubic spline curves indicated a linear relationship between leg, trunk and total FMR with OA. The discriminatory performances of FMR measures were modest (area under the curve 0.635–0.656). SII mediated 2.4%–2.6% of the association between FMR and OA. Conclusion A higher FMR in all body regions is associated with a higher risk of OA, which is partially mediated by systemic inflammation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ge et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba43884e9516ffd37a4e68https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536261435725
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper