Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Physical investigation explores the stability of tunnel faces, indicating crucial hydraulic and geological influences.
In this study, we explore the stability of shield tunnel faces excavated entirely within confined aquifers through a combined physical investigation. A series of orthogonally designed model tests were performed to examine how the hydraulic head difference (Δh) and aquitard thickness (M) jointly influence face stability and seepage behavior. Our results reveal a distinct concave-downward pore-pressure profile and a steep hydraulic gradient immediately ahead of the excavation face. Excavation-induced stress redistribution was largely restricted to the aquifer, whereas the overlying aquitard exhibited negligible disturbance due to its low permeability and higher strength. The evolution of stress disturbance followed a three-stage process encompassing initial disturbance, progressive development, and large-scale destabilization. Deformation contours exhibited a conical failure zone with normalized width and height ranging from 0.7D to 1.0D and 1.7D to 1.86D. Surface settlements remained within ±1 mm, confirming that deformation was effectively confined below the aquitard. Numerical simulations reproduced the overall hydro-mechanical response, validating the experimental observations but slightly overpredicting support pressures due to the absence of arching effects. The findings highlight Δh/M as the dominant control parameter, with aquitard thickness exerting a moderating influence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: