This paper reinterprets Wiles' Modularity Theorem as a cryptographic framework exploiting the correspondence between elliptic curves E/ℚ and modular forms f ∈ S₂ (Γ₀ (N) ). The asymmetric nature of this correspondence, where the forward mapping (Curve → Form) is tractable but the inverse (Form → Curve) is computationally hard, functions as a cryptographic trapdoor mechanism. We introduce two hardness assumptions: Modular Correspondence Hardness (MCH) and Form-to-Curve Trapdoor (FCT), capturing the intractability of reconstructing modular forms from partial data. Under Sato-Tate distribution, Fourier coefficients aₚ provide pseudorandomness with entropy bounds H (aₚᵢ) ≥ k · log₂ (√N). We present concrete constructions including Modular Form-based Key Exchange (MFKE), q-expansion key derivation, and Hecke transform signatures, demonstrating potential post-quantum advantages as these problems resist known quantum algorithms.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Eunice Lee
Sophia Shim
Caleb Lee
QED Labs
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lee et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba43b64e9516ffd37a530a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19044356
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: