PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 18, 2026International Journal of Molecular Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Membranous E-Cadherin Expression in Different Subtypes of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors and Its Association with Invasiveness

View Full Paper
AKAnna Lidia KrzentowskaBBBeata BiesagaNational Institute of OncologyAMAnna Merklinger-GruchałaAndrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the expression of membranous E-cadherin in various PitNET subtypes and its connection to invasiveness.
  • Evaluated mE-cad expression percentage in PitNET subtypes
  • Assessed transcription factor lineages: Pit-1, SF-1, TPIT
  • Scored staining intensity and proportion of positive cells
  • Analyzed associations with cavernous sinus invasion
  • Mean mE-cad expression varied among subtypes: 5.2% gonadotroph, 3.2% corticotroph, 0.5% lactotroph, 17.5% plurihormonal
  • Lower mE-cad expression linked to higher odds of cavernous sinus invasion (adjusted OR = 6.0)
  • Gonadotroph tumors with low mE-cad scores showed higher invasiveness (p = 0.012)

Abstract

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are usually benign intracranial neoplasms that may exhibit invasion of the cavernous sinus, complicating surgery and increasing the risk of recurrence. This study aimed to investigate membranous E-cadherin (mE-cad) expression across PitNET subtypes and transcription factor (TF) lineages, including Pit-1 (pituitary-specific positive transcription factor 1), SF-1 (Steroidogenic Factor 1), and TPIT (T-box pituitary transcription factor), and its association with tumor invasiveness in sixty-nine patients. mE-cad expression was evaluated as the percentage of positive cells (0%, 1–10%, >10%) and by immunoreactive score (IRS). Staining intensity was scored as: 0, no staining; 1, weak; 2, moderate; 3, strong. The proportion of positive cells was scored as: 0, none; 1, 80%. Mean mE-cad expression was 5.2% in gonadotroph, 3.2% in corticotroph, 0.5% in lactotroph, and 17.5% in plurihormonal PitNETs. By TF lineage, the mean expression was 5.3% for Pit-1, 3.2% for TPIT, and 5.1% for SF-1. Low mE-cad expression (IRS 1–2) was associated with higher odds of cavernous sinus invasion compared with IRS 3–6 (adjusted OR = 6.0, 95% CI 1.08–33.4, p = 0.04), independent of tumor volume (adjusted OR = 4.0, 95% CI 1.50–10.7, p = 0.01). After restricting the analysis to the gonadotroph PitNET group, tumors with an IRS of 1–2 showed significantly higher invasiveness compared with those with an IRS of 3–6 (p = 0.012). These findings suggest that mE-cad may serve as a biomarker of PitNET invasiveness, with expression varying according to TF lineage and tumor subtype.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Krzentowska et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba44654e9516ffd37a61a3https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062672
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1E-cadherin expression and gene expression profiles in corticotroph pituitary neuroendocrine tumor subtypes2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2Predicting Response to Medical Treatment in Acromegaly via Granulation Pattern, Expression of Somatostatin Receptors Type 2 and 5 and E-Cadherin2024 · 12 citations
  3. 3Histopathological classification of non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors2017 · 89 citations
  4. 4Pituitary adenomas: historical perspective, surgical management and future directions2015 · 96 citations
  5. 5Somatostatin receptor ligands in the treatment of acromegaly2017 · 125 citations