Experimental validation shows strong coupling in monolayer and bilayer systems, suggesting advancements in quantum technologies.
Strong coupling between excitons in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) and plasmonic nanocavities offers a promising platform for advancing photonic and quantum technologies through enhanced light-matter interactions. Although plasmonic strong coupling has been widely studied, its manifestation between gold nanorods (GNs) and bilayer TMDs remains relatively unexplored. A critical challenge has been the scarcity of full anti-crossing behavior in photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy, a defining signature of strong coupling. Here, we demonstrate unambiguous strong coupling between a single gold nanorod cavity and excitons in both monolayer and bilayer WS₂. This is confirmed by the direct observation of emission from both the upper and lower polariton branches in scattering and photoluminescence spectra. Combined experiments, supported by finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations and dark-field spectroscopy, reveal a Rabi splitting of 190 meV in scattering for monolayer WS₂, with PL splitting of 95 meV under 532 nm excitation, respectively. For bilayer WS₂, we observe a Rabi splitting of 185 meV in scattering and a PL splitting of 75 meV under the same excitation conditions. These results indicate stronger plasmon-exciton coupling in the monolayer system. Furthermore, theoretical simulations using a coupled oscillator model accurately reproduce the energy separation and intensity ratios of the polaritonic peaks, showing excellent agreement with experimental scattering and PL data. The demonstration of substantial room-temperature Rabi splitting within a single plasmonic nanocavity opens new pathways for exploring nonlinear phenomena, electrical tuning, and quantum correlations, which are essential for developing practical quantum optoelectronic devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faisal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: