PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026Annals of Internal Medicine2 citations

New GRADE Evidence-to-Decision Framework for Pairwise and Multiple Comparisons (GRADE Guidance 45)

View Full Paper
JBJessica BeltránIEItziar Etxeandia-IkobaltzetaTPThomas Piggott

Key Points

  • The aim is to outline an improved framework for reviews of pairwise and multiple comparisons in health outcomes.
  • Described new Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) framework with two parts for pairwise and multiple comparisons.
  • Defined key components like question definition, assessment criteria, and conclusions.
  • Provided examples for presenting findings from the framework.
  • Introduced the new 'net effect' criterion for assessment.
  • Included decision thresholds to guide health outcome evaluations.
  • Highlighted limitations regarding usability testing across various guidelines.

Abstract

This article describes the new EtD framework, which now includes 2 corresponding parts for reviews of pairwise and multiple comparisons. The authors describe application to a review with multiple comparisons for the different parts of the EtD framework: the question definition, which now includes the presentation of values of health outcomes and decision thresholds; the assessment section, where the new "net effect" criterion has been included; and the conclusion section, which includes an adaptation for multiple comparisons. The article provides examples and suggestions for presentation of findings. The framework does have limitations, in that its usability has not been tested across a broad spectrum of guideline development contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Beltrán et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb9247496e729e6297f61bhttps://doi.org/10.7326/annals-25-04273
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper