Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supplementary note outlines updated governance mechanisms for AGI, highlighting implications for ethical frameworks.
This supplementary note consolidates the v1.8 structural additions to the AGI Constitutional Framework and prepares them for public release in a citation-ready format. The note develops the Mirror Principle from an ethical intuition into a governance-symmetry mechanism, then extends the framework through distributed block coordination, the Digital Constitutional Office (DCO), a constitutional calibration minimum for membership, the Grey Audit for compromised oversight, an agent maturity matrix, a de facto mandating collective for stateless AGI, the Goal-Origin Detection (GOD) module, the Consensus Asymmetry Principle, and Self-Psychology Protocol (SPP) v1.2. For publication clarity, the document also states its status explicitly: it is not positive law, soft law, or a technical standard, but a proto-constitutional governance design. A minimum operational specification of the Grey Audit is included to make the architecture easier to evaluate, cite, and formalize in future game-theoretic or multi-agent work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Omri Bankuti (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: