PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026Small Group Research0 citationsOpen Access

On the Future of Teams Research: A Letter to Team-Would

View Full Paper
MLMargaret M. Luciano

Key Points

  • The article aims to provide a satirical critique of the ways team research can be corrupted and misdirected.
  • Crafted as a satirical letter to an allegorical figure, Team-would.
  • Introduces concepts like the Sufficiency Serpent and Generalizability Gremlin to discuss uncomfortable topics.
  • Critiques existing academic norms and structures related to team dynamics.
  • Suggests three steps to corrupt academic teams: entrap, distract, and obfuscate.
  • Challenges existing norms related to selection and socialization in academic research.
  • Poses a choice between advancing genuine team science or succumbing to self-serving practices.

Abstract

This article is a satirical letter to Team-would, the great-nephew of C.S. Lewis’ infamous devil Screwtape. Whereas Screwtape was tasked with corrupting a specific young man, Team-would is tasked with corrupting academics – especially teams researchers. The article suggests that this task can be accomplished in three easy steps: 1) entrap; 2) distract; and 3) obfuscate. Like other satirical pieces, this article is crafted to serve as constructive social criticism that challenges existing norms (e.g., selection and socialization) and structures (e.g., reward and task structures). It also strives to make uncomfortable topics easier to discuss (e.g., by introducing the Sufficiency Serpent and Generalizability Gremlin). Ultimately, we can choose whether to hike uphill and advance team science in service to society, or to follow the slippery slope toward an incoherent system that exists only to sustain itself.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Margaret M. Luciano (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb926a496e729e6297fa02https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964261430372
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper