PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports0 citations

Sex Differences in Three‐Dimensional Muscle Shape: Disentangling Allometry From Sexual Dimorphism Using Statistical Shape Modeling

View Full Paper
JUJun UmeharaMTMasashi TaniguchiMYMasahide Yagi

Key Points

  • The study aims to identify and analyze sex differences in the shape of the quadriceps femoris muscle, separating allometric effects from true sexual dimorphism.
  • Employed magnetic resonance imaging to capture muscle anatomy.
  • Measured size characteristics of the quadriceps femoris muscle heads.
  • Developed statistical shape models to analyze muscle shape variation.
  • Compared muscle size and shape between males and females.
  • Used linear discrimination for shape-based sex classification.
  • Males exhibited greater muscle volume, cross-sectional area, length, width, and thickness than females.
  • Statistical shape models revealed significant shape differences linked to sex.
  • While many differences were accounted for by size (allometry), some intrinsic shape differences remained.
  • Specific shape characteristics in the vastus lateralis and vastus medialis differentiated males and females with high accuracy.

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism in skeletal muscles is evident in both size and shape. As most morphological traits scale with size, disentangling allometric effects from sexual dimorphism is essential for revealing sex-related shape differences; however, this remains underexplored in human muscles. This study aimed to identify sex differences in muscle shape within the human quadriceps femoris, with a novel approach based on muscle statistical shape modeling. Magnetic resonance images of 43 healthy young adults (22 males and 21 females) were obtained. Muscle size of the four heads of quadriceps femoris was measured, and statistical shape models were developed to quantify the muscle shape variation. Muscle size and shape were compared between males and females, and shape-based sex classification was performed using linear discrimination. While males showed significantly greater volume, anatomical cross-sectional area, length, width, and thickness in all muscles, the statistical shape models demonstrated sex-related shape differences. When adjusting for muscle volume, the primary sex-related shape differences were largely explained by allometry. However, some distinct sex differences were preserved, specifically for the bulging and shrinkage at different regions in the vastus lateralis and the anterior edge shrinkage, distal bulging, and thickness variation within the vastus medialis. These shape differences distinguished male and female with high accuracy. Our findings revealed that although most sex differences in quadriceps femoris shape are driven by size (allometry), intrinsic shape differences between sexes exist. This study highlights the utility of statistical shape modeling in distinguishing allometric effects from true sexual dimorphism in muscle morphology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Umehara et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb928c496e729e6297fdfbhttps://doi.org/10.1111/sms.70260
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Dynamic similarity and the peculiar allometry of maximum running speed2024 · 24 citations
  2. 2Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images1999 · 5,314 citations
  3. 3Sexual dimorphism and allometry in human scapula shape2024 · 7 citations
  4. 4Sexual Dimorphism1985 · 304 citations
  5. 5Gender Differences in Achilles Tendon Ruptures—A Retrospective Study and a Review of the Literature2024 · 18 citations