PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026Innovative Higher Education0 citationsOpen Access

Gender Equity in Higher Education During Disruptive Events: Communities of Practice in the NSF ADVANCE Network

JGJessica R. GoldADAllison DeeseLNLaura K. Nelson

Key Points

  • The central aim is to investigate how gender equity initiatives persisted within higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Examined the National Science Foundation's ADVANCE program
  • Conducted semi-structured interviews with equity advocates
  • Analyzed the roles of various sub-communities of practice during crises
  • Identified cognitive, social, and emotional support needs among members
  • Formal and informal sub-communities offered critical support during the early pandemic stages
  • Institutionally supported sub-communities became important later, translating adaptations into lasting practices
  • Different CoP structures addressed varying needs throughout crisis response.
  • Findings contribute to understanding of CoPs as supportive infrastructures for equity work.

Abstract

Equity-focused initiatives in higher education institutions (HEIs) are particularly vulnerable during times of crisis, as disruptions can stall progress and institutions may deprioritize structural change efforts. This study examines how equity advocates within the National Science Foundation’s ADVANCE program, a long-standing initiative to promote gender equity in academic STEM, persisted during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conceptualize ADVANCE not only as a funding mechanism but as a large, multi-institutional community of practice (CoP) that includes overlapping sub-communities that vary in structure and purpose. Using semi-structured interview data, we show how the formal ADVANCE CoP incubated a diverse array of sub-CoPs that played distinct roles throughout the crisis. Peer-led, less formal sub-CoPs were especially vital early in the pandemic response, offering emotional, social, and practical support when institutions were largely immobilized. More formal, institutionally supported sub-CoPs became increasingly important as the pandemic went on, translating short-term adaptations into durable practices and institutional memory. Our findings highlight how different forms of organizational structure within CoPs support different types of needs—cognitive, social, and emotional—at different stages of crisis response. This study contributes to CoP scholarship and research on equity work in HEIs by advancing a relational and temporal understanding of CoPs as infrastructures of support. Rather than privileging knowledge sharing functions alone, we argue that sustainable equity work requires distributed and flexible CoP ecosystems capable of meeting the multifaceted needs of their members. Especially in times of crisis, these networks of care, trust, and collaboration are essential to preserving momentum and enabling long-term institutional transformation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gold et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb929b496e729e629800fehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-026-09878-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper