PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics0 citations

Validating Clinical Anthropometry in the Assessment of Pediatric Pectus Carinatum

View Full Paper
SVSuniel D. VeerakoneAKA KemperNPNatalie W. Patrick

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the correlation between clinical anthropometry and 3D scan measurements for assessing pectus carinatum severity.
  • Conducted a retrospective study involving 86 patients diagnosed with pectus carinatum.
  • Measured chest dimensions manually (clinical anthropometry) and using 3D scans.
  • Calculated Pearson’s correlation coefficients to evaluate relationships between the two measurement methods.
  • Assessed measurement consistency among three raters using intraclass correlation coefficients.
  • Demonstrated a strong linear relationship between clinical anthropometry and 3D scan measurements for chest circumference (r = 0.90–0.93).
  • Found strong correlations for medial-lateral (r = 0.83–0.84) and anterior-posterior dimensions (r = 0.81–0.88).
  • Indicated good to excellent reliability in measurements between raters (r = 0.81–0.98).

Abstract

Background: The severity of pectus carinatum is assessed by computed tomography, X-ray, three-dimensional (3D) scans, or clinical anthropometry. During orthotic treatment of pectus carinatum, progression or improvement is often assessed with clinical anthropometry. There is a strong correlation between measurements derived from 3D scans and radiographic imaging, but the correlation between measurements from 3D scans and clinical anthropometry is unknown. This study aimed to assess the correlation between clinical anthropometry and 3D scan-derived measurements of pectus carinatum. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 86 patients with pectus carinatum. The anterior–posterior and medial–lateral chest dimensions and chest circumference at maximum protrusion of the deformity were measured using two methods: manually by the treating clinician (clinical anthropometry) and from a 3D scanned model of the chest. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the strength of the relationship between the clinical anthropometry and the 3D scan-derived measurements. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to measure the consistency of measurements among three raters. Results: There is a strong linear relationship between clinical anthropometry and 3D scan-derived measurements for all three chest measurements. Pearson’s correlation coefficient for chest circumference (r = 0.90–0.93), medial–lateral dimension (r = 0.83–0.84), and anterior–posterior dimension (r = 0.81–0.88) all showed a strong positive correlation. Intraclass correlation coefficients showed good or excellent reliability of measurements among the raters (r = 0.81–0.98). Conclusion: This study helps validate the use of clinical anthropometry in measuring severity and response to treatment in patients with pectus carinatum. Clinical Relevance: Standard clinical measurement techniques in pectus carinatum are a reliable metric to assess changes in deformity during orthotic treatment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Veerakone et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb92ae496e729e62980248https://doi.org/10.1097/jpo.0000000000000627
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of the treatment of pectus carinatum with compressive orthotic bracing using three dimensional body scans2014 · 29 citations
  2. 2Supporting information retrieval from electronic health records: A report of University of Michigan’s nine-year experience in developing and using the Electronic Medical Record Search Engine (EMERSE)2015 · 452 citations
  3. 3Compressive orthotics in the treatment of asymmetric pectus carinatum: A preliminary report with an objective radiographic marker2000 · 76 citations
  4. 4Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.1979 · 23,310 citations
  5. 5Usefulness of 3-Dimensional Body Surface Scanning in the Evaluation of Patients with Pectus Carinatum2020 · 11 citations