PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 19, 2026The Energy Journal0 citations

Do Power Markets Promote Decarbonization? Evidence from State Level Data in the United States

View Full Paper
LKL. Lynne KieslingJRJoshua D. RhodesSZSamantha Zyontz

Key Points

  • This research investigates how wholesale power markets affect decarbonization within the U.S. electricity sector over the last three decades.
  • Analyzed annual state-level data from 1990 to 2020
  • Utilized difference-in-differences empirical strategy to compare restructured and control states
  • Focused on changes in electricity generation sources across time periods
  • Carbon dioxide emissions from the electricity sector are 32 percent lower than 2005 levels
  • Wholesale markets showed a greater increase in lower-carbon sources by 2012 compared to control states
  • In recent years, generation mixes in restructured and control states have started to converge

Abstract

Since the mid-1990s the changing electricity generation technology mix has been associated with electricity sector carbon dioxide emissions that are 32 percent lower than their 2005 levels. What role have wholesale power markets played in enabling this decarbonization? We examine this question using annual state-level data for 1990 to 2020. The institutional complexity of the history of wholesale power markets and regulatory restructuring informs our block treatment window difference-in-differences empirical strategy, in which we compare generation in restructured states to different control states across different time periods. Our results suggest that lower-carbon generating sources appear to be built in greater numbers in wholesale markets relative to the control states up to 2012, largely but not entirely due to the substitution of natural gas for other fossil fuel generation, namely coal. In more recent years, restructured states and control states look more similar in their generation mix. Our event study results support this conclusion. JEL Classification: L51, Economics of Regulation; L94, Electric Utilities; Q35, Hydrocarbon Resources; Q48, Energy: Government Policy; Q53, Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kiesling et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69bb92df496e729e62980850https://doi.org/10.1177/01956574251410551
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Do Competitive Markets Clean Up the US Electricity Sector?: Evidence From the Southwest Power Pool2025 · 3 citations
  2. 2The Fall of Coal: Joint Impacts of Fuel Prices and Renewables on Generation and Emissions2018 · 178 citations
  3. 3Selling Power2016 · 19 citations
  4. 4Kindred spirits or intergovernmental competition? The innovation and diffusion of energy policies in the American states (1990–2008)2014 · 116 citations
  5. 5Natural Gas: From Shortages to Abundance in the United States2013 · 153 citations