Scoping review maps effectiveness of UV-C light disinfection in hospitals, suggesting improved safety outcomes.
To map and describe the scientific evidence on germicidal ultraviolet C (UV-C) light for hospital surface disinfection, this scoping review examined device types, reported operational parameters, microbiological and clinical outcomes, and implementation aspects. Primary studies conducted in hospital settings and evaluating UV-C or ultraviolet germicidal irradiation on environmental surfaces were searched in four databases without date restrictions. Data were synthesized descriptively in tables and narrative form following JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidance. Eleven studies (2007–2025) met the inclusion criteria. Reported microbial reductions ranged from 1 to ≥5 log10. Higher and more consistent reductions were predominantly observed under laboratory or controlled experimental conditions, whereas reductions in real-world hospital surface sampling were more variable and influenced by pathogen type, surface material, room geometry, and shadowing. Integration of UV-C with manual cleaning and multi-position irradiation cycles was associated with greater effectiveness. Reporting of key radiometric parameters (dose, exposure time, and distance) was frequently incomplete, limiting reproducibility and cross-study comparability. Clinical findings were heterogeneous: some interrupted time-series analyses suggested reductions in healthcare-associated infections, although effects were not uniform across microorganisms. Implementation reports described room-level cycle times compatible with turnover, variable staffing requirements, and limited economic evaluation. Overall, UV-C appears to be a promising adjunct to standard cleaning practices in hospital environments. However, standardized radiometric reporting, multicenter studies, and robust clinical and economic evaluations are necessary to support safe, reproducible, and sustainable large-scale implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elias et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: