Philosophy has long imagined that seriousness begins when thought reaches the proper question and then secures itself in the search for ground. I reject this image entirely. Thought does not arrive first, by the time thought forms itself into question, distinction, theory, or method, something is already there. Something has already been forced into shape strongly enough to confront it. The issue did not wait in innocence for philosophy to begin. It had already been carried, cut, narrowed, and made to stand there. That is why thought is late, the question is therefore late as well. It does not open the matter. It enters a field already shaped enough to move. Ground is late too. It is retrospective shelter, thought's attempt to soften the humiliation of arrival by imagining that beneath what already presses there must still be a cleaner floor. What comes first is harsher, life goes on before mastery, nothing goes on whole and because of that, whatever goes on does so by carry, carry cuts, the cut makes something stand there, what stands there insists and only then does thought arrive. Truth, judgment, and building remain, but only without innocence. The task is not to recover an origin. It is to build anyway under answerability before what thought did not first bring into being.
Musevver Ugursal (Tue,) studied this question.