Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed-methods study assesses perceptions of language intervention effectiveness among early intervention providers, suggesting improvements for implementation.
To effectively translate evidence-based language and communication interventions for young children into early intervention (EI) service systems, it is imperative to understand EI providers' perspectives on the structure and procedures of specific interventions, including the professional development needed to support implementation. This pilot explanatory sequential mixed-methods study collected feedback from EI providers who participated in a recent professional development study focused on implementing a naturalistic caregiver-implemented language intervention, Promoting Communication Tools for Advancing Language in Kids (PC TALK). Through online questionnaires and semi-structured interviews, we explored providers' perceptions of the intervention’s acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness, as well as its benefits, barriers, and recommendations for broader EI system implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: