Mixed methods study uncovers conflicting views on family engagement among early intervention providers, highlighting the need for consistent strengths-based practices.
Early intervention providers work with children 0–3 and their families and come from a variety of disciplines. To better understand how providers enact family-centered and capacity-building practices in their work, we surveyed 95 providers in Illinois and conducted 19 follow-up interviews. Within the survey, participants responded to 15 Likert-type items. We analyzed the qualitative survey and interview data to determine themes, showing that (1) EI providers have expectations that families be both passive and active participants in services; (2) EI providers hold both strengths-based and judgment-based views of families; (3) EI providers value routines-based and specialized materials when providing services to children and families; (4) EI providers value connecting families to resources but may view some resources as outside their role; (5) EI providers collaborate with families by getting their input and building their capacities; and (6) EI providers’ professional and personal qualities set the stage for family-centered and capacity-building practices. We analyzed data quantitatively, including looking at differences among types of providers (i.e., from different disciplines, with different years of experience, and independent vs. agency-affiliated providers) and found statistically significant differences for only one statement. We mixed the data and developed joint displays to provide a more nuanced perspective. Findings of this study indicated a need to build a shared understanding among providers about how to partner with families effectively and use strengths-based practices. We need to better understand how providers reflect family-centered and capacity-building practices, because these ultimately profoundly impact families’ experiences in early intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hardy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: