Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical reflections uncover the effectiveness of lawsuits for non-pecuniary damage from environmental violations, suggesting legal protection mechanisms.
The Constitution of the Republic of Serbia guarantees the right to a healthy environment, while the Law on Contracts and Torts leaves room for compensation for non-pecuniary damage arising from the violation of personal rights. The paper analyzes whether the right to a healthy environment is considered a personal right, what constitutes its violation, and whether a lawsuit for compensation for non-pecuniary damage arising from the violation of this right is the most effective mechanism for protecting the rights of persons endangered by pollution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petra Stanojević (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: