This article examines Einstein's relativity and its interaction with the Theory of Objectivity, suggesting a new foundational framework.
This article presents a critical–propositional examination of Albert Einstein’s foundational texts on relativity in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). Focusing on the conceptual core of special and general relativity, the study investigates the extent to which Einstein’s framework can be interpreted as a powerful regional physics of already constituted phenomena, while also questioning its modal sufficiency as an ultimate ontology of cosmic origin. The article argues that relativity remains one of the greatest achievements of modern physics, especially in its reconfiguration of space, time, gravitation, and observation. At the same time, from the standpoint of the Theory of Objectivity, relativity does not begin from primordial Nothingness, does not deduce the necessity of ontological boundary, does not fully ground relational observation as a constitutive condition of existence, and does not explicitly formulate the transcendent element as information or knowledge produced in atomic relations and expressed as radiation. Drawing on the foundational bibliography of TO, its recent modal and testability-oriented developments, and a broader dialogue with modern physics and philosophy of science, the article proposes a hierarchical integration between the two frameworks. In this view, the Theory of Objectivity functions as an ontological-modal and cosmogonic discipline, while relativity is preserved as a highly successful geometric and phenomenological description of structured cosmic regimes. The study also develops a propositional rereading of gravity as an observable manifestation of deeper convergence zones, interprets radiation as a possible support of informational transcendence, and situates relativity within the cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity. By doing so, the article does not reject Einsteinian physics, but reinscribes it within a broader modal framework that seeks to connect logical necessity, phenomenic structure, and empirical contact. This work is intended as a contribution to respectful scientific dialogue, interdisciplinary ontology, and the ongoing development of the Theory of Objectivity as a candidate framework for a new foundation of physics and cosmology. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; Theory of Relativity; Albert Einstein; modal ontology; cosmology; gravity; spacetime; informational transcendence; radiation; convergence zones; phenomenic structure; Gödelian discipline; cosmogony; philosophy of physics; scientific dialogue
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cabannas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: