Varying durations of triple antithrombotic therapy (<1 week, 1 week-1 month, >1 month) resulted in no significant difference in composite bleeding events at 1 year (10% vs 4% vs 20%, p=0.326).
Cohort (n=39)
No
Does varying the duration of triple antithrombotic therapy reduce bleeding or ischemic events in patients with atrial fibrillation following percutaneous coronary intervention?
In a small retrospective cohort of patients with AF undergoing PCI, ultra-short and short durations of triple antithrombotic therapy were associated with low bleeding rates and no ischemic events, supporting the safety of early de-escalation.
Absolute Event Rate: 10% vs 20%
p-value: p=0.326
Objectives: The optimal duration of triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) consisting of an anticoagulant and dual antiplatelet therapy is unclear in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on anticoagulation who require percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Guidelines recommend TAT be continued up to 1 week in most patients or up to 1 month in patients at increased thrombotic risk. However, these recommendations are based on expert opinion due to the lack of randomized controlled trials directly comparing TAT duration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the optimal duration of TAT in patients with AF following PCI. Materials and Methods: This study was a single-center, retrospective cohort study. Subject cohorts were determined based on TAT duration of <1 week (ultra-short group), 1 week–1 month (short group), or 1 month–1 year (extended group). The primary outcome was a composite of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding events. Secondary outcomes included ischemic events, deaths, and hospitalizations for revascularization. Results: During the study, 39 patients met criteria for inclusion and were categorized as follows: Ultra-short group n = 10 (25.6%), short group n = 24 (61.5%), and extended group n = 5 (12.8%). There was no difference in the primary outcome between the groups at 1 year. In addition, there were no differences in any of the secondary outcomes. Conclusion: While this study did not find any differences in outcomes between groups, these findings should be viewed as descriptive and exploratory due to the small sample size. Larger studies are needed to further evaluate the effects of varying durations of TAT.
Berman et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (n=39). Ultra-short (<1 week) or short (1 week-1 month) triple antithrombotic therapy vs. Extended (>1 month-1 year) triple antithrombotic therapy was evaluated on Composite of ISTH major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding within 1 year (p=0.326). Varying durations of triple antithrombotic therapy (<1 week, 1 week-1 month, >1 month) resulted in no significant difference in composite bleeding events at 1 year (10% vs 4% vs 20%, p=0.326).