Models pooled rideshare adoption and TNC profitability in urban systems, indicating impactful outcomes for future travel modes.
Pooled rideshare is considered an effective future travel mode for improving vehicle utilization and reducing congestion in urban transportation systems. However, its adoption remains limited due to insufficient passenger acceptance and uncertain economic benefits for transportation network companies (TNCs). The emergence of autonomous vehicles brings new momentum to pooled ridesharing services through centralized fleet management. Nevertheless, most existing studies examine traveler behavior and fleet operations separately, leaving the interaction between passenger preferences and operational strategies insufficiently represented. This study proposed an integrated behavioral–operational framework that jointly considers traveler choice behavior and fleet management decisions. An Integrated Choice and Latent Variable (ICLV) model is estimated using 8296 national survey responses collected in the United States in 2025 to capture post-pandemic traveler attitudes toward pooled rideshare. The behavioral model is embedded into a proactive assignment and repositioning strategy implemented on the POLARIS agent-based simulation platform. Simulation experiments are conducted in two urban networks, Greenville (SC) and Austin (TX), under multiple fleet size scenarios. Results show that the new pooling behavior model significantly increases pooling adoption compared with the previous mixed logit model, indicating that it better captures real-world traveler behavior. And the higher pooling adoption also reshapes the TNC trip structure in Greenville. Compared to the baseline in the POLARIS platform, the integrated framework increases pooling adoption and TNC profitability while reducing VMT, empty seat rates, and overall energy consumption. These findings provide insights for the sustainable deployment of pooled SAV services in heterogeneous urban environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: