Implements a dual-constrained approach to enhance 3D building mesh quality, indicating improved structural accuracy and semantic consistency.
Achieving lightweight representations of building mesh models with accurate geometry and fine structural details is a key challenge in urban 3D modelling. Most existing mesh simplification methods focus on minimizing geometric error while neglecting the specific characteristics of building models in terms of geometric structure and semantic hierarchy, thus leading to structural degradation and semantic inconsistencies. To address this issue, this paper proposes a structure–semantic dual-constrained edge-collapse decimation method for simplifying dense building mesh models reconstructed from point clouds. Our core innovation lies in the joint enforcement of geometric structural constraints and building semantic constraints to effectively preserve both geometric structural features and component-level semantic structures of the models. By incorporating these two constraints, we adaptively assign higher collapse penalties to key structural edges and semantic boundaries, achieving lightweight building model simplification while maintaining fine-level structural details even under high compression ratios. Our method is extensively validated on several datasets of varying scales and complexities, including single-building models from Sketchfab, the large-scale urban datasets SUM and STPLS3D, and the ArCH cultural heritage dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves superior or comparable performance compared to the existing methods across all the test datasets, consistently achieving lower or on-par geometric errors measured by RMSE and MAE. Furthermore, our simplified results can be semantically organized and stored under the CityGML paradigm, which provides a unified data support for sharing, semantic retrieval, downstream analysis, and other applications of lightweight building models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: