Key result
Stratified anatomical ablation is linked to ~26% greater 24-month success versus traditional PVI in persistent AF.
Why the study?
Outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation alone for persistent AF remain unsatisfactory, prompting assessment of a personalized stratified anatomical ablation strategy.
Does a stratified anatomical ablation (BCXL) strategy improve ablation success rates compared to traditional PVI in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=244)
No
Does a stratified anatomical ablation (BCXL) strategy improve ablation success rates compared to traditional PVI in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
A personalized, risk-stratified anatomical ablation strategy significantly improves long-term rhythm control compared to traditional PVI alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Supports stratified anatomical ablation over PVI in persistent AF; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice pending RCTs.
Radiofrequency ablation is the cornerstone treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF); however, outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone remain unsatisfactory. We aimed to assess a personalized stratified anatomical ablation strategy for persistent AF by comparing the effectiveness of BCXL (BC: extensive encircling PVI [EEPVI]; XL: stratified linear ablation based on left atrial substrate) with that of PVI. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with persistent AF undergoing radiofrequency ablation at Xinqiao Hospital between 2017 and 2021. Patients were stratified into BCXL and PVI groups. The follow-up period was 24 months. The primary endpoint was the documented recurrence of atrial arrhythmia lasting ≥ 30 s after a 3-month blanking period. The study included 244 patients (BCXL group, n = 159; PVI group, n = 85). The ablation success rate at 24 months was significantly higher in the BCXL group than in the PVI group (80.4% vs. 63.8%, p = 0.006). Specifically, intermediate- to high-risk patients (CAAP-AF score > 5) in the BCXL group achieved a higher success rate than those in the PVI group (76.8% vs. 59.6%, p = 0.032). After adjusting for confounding factors (CAAP-AF score, left atrial low-voltage zone, age, sex, and body mass index), stratified anatomical ablation remained an independent predictor of ablation success (OR: 3.513; 95% CI: 1.725–7.154; p = 0.001). A personalized stratified anatomical ablation strategy improves radiofrequency ablation outcomes, particularly in patients with intermediate- to high-risk AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=244). Stratified anatomical ablation (BCXL) vs. Traditional pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was evaluated on Ablation success (freedom from documented recurrence of atrial arrhythmia lasting ≥30 s after a 3-month blanking period) (OR 3.513, 95% CI 1.725-7.154, p=0.001). Stratified anatomical ablation (BCXL) significantly increased the 24-month ablation success rate compared to traditional pulmonary vein isolation (80.4% vs. 63.8%, OR 3.513) in persistent AF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: