Key result
CTA detects extracoronary vascular abnormalities in ~48% of SCAD survivors, including FMD and silent aneurysms.
Observational (n=109)
Yes
Comprehensive head-to-pelvis vascular imaging in SCAD survivors reveals a high prevalence (47.7%) of extracoronary vascular abnormalities, including a notable 23.2% rate of silent aneurysms that may require intervention.
EVA was identified in 47.7% of the cohort. The prevalence of FMD was 32.1%, aneurysms were observed in 23.2% of patients, dissections of cervical arteries in 5.5% of patients. 9.3% of patients presented with both FMD and aneurysms. FMD predominantly affected renal (20.3%) and cervical arteries (15.6%), while aneurysms most commonly affected renal and splenic arteries (7.3% each). Multisite FMD was present in 8.3% of patients. 4.6% of subjects had aneurysms in more than one vascular bed. Cervical FMD was associated with migraine headaches in 58.8% of patients and was clinically silent in 41.2% of cases. All aneurysms were silent, however, three patients with intracerebral aneurysms (12%) required intravascular treatment due to risk of rupture. In FMD patients, higher prevalence of type 2a SCAD (65.7 vs. 43.1%, P = 0.03) and pregnancy-associated SCAD (17.6 vs. 4.2%, P = 0.03) was observed. Patients with type 2a SCAD had a 2.5-fold higher likelihood of having FMD (OR 2.53; 95% CI 1.09-5.87, P = 0.03). Conclusions: This study reveals a significant prevalence of EVA in SCAD survivors, with silent aneurysms being more common than previously reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wiligórska et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) (n=109). Head-to-pelvis computed tomography angiography (CTA) was evaluated on Prevalence of extracoronary vascular abnormalities (EVA). Extracoronary vascular abnormalities were identified in 47.7% of spontaneous coronary artery dissection survivors, including fibromuscular dysplasia in 32.1% and silent aneurysms in 23.2%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: