PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 2026Clinical Hypertension2 citationsOpen Access

Cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular phenotypes and prognostic implications in hypertensive heart disease

PLPiyawat LertsiripatarajitKWKasinee WanitchungSPSumet Prechawuttidech

Key Result

CMR-derived concentric and eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy independently increased the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events by 2.8-fold and 2.4-fold compared to normal geometry.

Key Points

  • The study aimed to evaluate the prognostic implications of left ventricular phenotypes using cardiac magnetic resonance in hypertensive heart disease patients.
  • Included 756 patients with hypertension referred for cardiac magnetic resonance.
  • Defined four left ventricular phenotypes based on LV mass index, mass-to-volume ratio, and end-diastolic volume.
  • Followed patients for major adverse cardiovascular events over a median of 7.1 years.
  • Concentric hypertrophy, concentric remodeling, and eccentric hypertrophy were significantly associated with higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events.
  • Annualized MACE rates varied by phenotype, with eccentric hypertrophy having the highest rate at 5.8 per 100 patient-years.
  • Inclusion of LVEDVI and LVMI provided additional prognostic value beyond standard measures.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=756)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Do abnormal CMR-derived left ventricular phenotypes predict major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with hypertensive heart disease?

P
Population
756 consecutive patients aged ≥18 years with hypertension referred for clinically indicated CMR, mean age 70.0 ± 10.4 years, 47.2% male, based in Thailand. Excluded patients with specific cardiomyopathies, severe primary valvular disease, congenital heart disease, and prior cardiac surgery (except CABG).
I
Intervention
Abnormal left ventricular phenotypes (concentric remodeling, concentric hypertrophy, eccentric hypertrophy) assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)
C
Comparator
Normal left ventricular geometry assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)
O
Outcome
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure, and stroke over a median follow-up of 7.1 yearscomposite

CMR-derived abnormal left ventricular phenotypes provide incremental prognostic value for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with hypertensive heart disease.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 2.81 (95% CI 1.77-4.46)

Absolute Event Rate: 27% vs 13.5%

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • Conducted at a single tertiary care center, limiting generalizability to broader populations
  • Most patients were referred for CMR primarily for CAD evaluation, potentially overrepresenting suspected ischemia
  • Echocardiography and CMR were not performed concurrently, limiting direct modality comparisons
  • Myocardial strain parameters were not routinely assessed
  • Changes in antihypertensive therapy during follow-up were not systematically captured
  • Changes in LV remodeling over time were not assessed with serial imaging

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated an association between left ventricular (LV) phenotypes assessed by echocardiography and clinical outcomes in patients with hypertensive heart disease (HHD).However, data evaluating LV phenotypes using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-the reference standard for quantification of LV volume, mass, and function-remain limited.This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of CMRderived LV phenotypes in patients with HHD.Methods: We included 756 consecutive patients with hypertension who were referred for clinically indicated CMR at an academic hospital in Thailand between 2011 and 2019.Four LV phenotypes were defined using LV mass index (LVMI), LV mass-to-volume ratio, and LV enddiastolic volume index (LVEDVI).Patients were followed for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure, and stroke.Results: The mean age was 70 10 years, and 47% of patients were male.At baseline, 42.3% had controlled blood pressure, 37.0% had grade 1 hypertension, and 20.7% had grade 2-3 hypertension.The mean LVEF was 70.9 9.7%.Over a median follow-up of 7.1 years (interquartile range 4.1-9.2),153 MACE occurred.Annualized MACE rates were highest in patients with eccentric hypertrophy (5.8 per 100 patient-years), followed by concentric hypertrophy (3.5), concentric remodeling (2.7), and normal geometry (1.5).After multivariable adjustment, concentric remodeling (adjusted hazard ratio HR, 2.22; 95%confidence interval CI, 1.30-3.81;P = 0.004), concentric hypertrophy (adjusted HR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.77-4.46;P < 0.001), and eccentric hypertrophy (adjusted HR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.40-4.14;P = 0.002) remained independently associated with MACE.In addition, the combined inclusion of LVEDVI and LVMI, as well as LV phenotypes, provided incremental prognostic value beyond the baseline model (incremental 2 =23.29,P < 0.001 and 23.60, P < 0.001, respectively).Conclusions: CMR-based LV phenotyping was associated with prognosis in patients with HHD, with abnormal LV phenotypes demonstrating higher risks of MACE compared with normal geometry.These findings indicate that CMR may have a complementary role in risk assessment among patients with hypertension.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lertsiripatarajit et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Hypertensive heart disease (n=756). CMR-derived abnormal LV phenotypes (Concentric hypertrophy) vs. Normal geometry was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (HR 2.81, 95% CI 1.77-4.46, p=<0.001). CMR-derived concentric and eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy independently increased the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events by 2.8-fold and 2.4-fold compared to normal geometry.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be34f26e48c4981c6731f5https://doi.org/10.5646/ch.2026.32.e14
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper