Demonstrates enhanced antitumor effects of green-synthesized silver nanoparticles in Ehrlich solid tumor-bearing mice, suggesting a novel cancer therapy approach.
Clove ( Syzygium aromaticum ) is a medicinal spice rich in bioactive compounds with potent antioxidant and therapeutic activities, making it a promising candidate for anticancer applications. Leveraging these properties, we synthesized green silver nanoparticles loaded with S. aromaticum extract (AgNPs-SAE) to enhance its antitumor potential. This study evaluated the efficacy of SAE and AgNPs-SAE in Ehrlich solid tumor (EST)-bearing mice, compared with doxorubicin (DOX). Forty mice were divided into four groups ( n = 10): untreated EST control, SAE (500 mg/kg, orally), AgNPs-SAE (30 mg/kg, orally), and DOX (10 mg/kg, i. p., for 3 days). In vitro , SAE and AgNPs-SAE exhibited cytotoxicity against NBL and MCF7 cells, with higher potency observed for AgNPs-SAE. In vivo , both SAE and AgNPs-SAE significantly reduced tumor growth, with tumor volumes decreased, compared to the untreated group, and extended survival compared to the untreated and DOX-treated groups. Unlike DOX, which elevated hepatic and renal biomarkers in the mouse model, SAE and AgNPs-SAE preserved organ function. These findings indicate that, in this preclinical study, SAE and AgNPs-SAE exhibit promising antitumor efficacy with reduced hepatorenal toxicity compared to DOX, supporting further investigation in preclinical models. Mechanistic analyses indicated that SAE and AgNPs-SAE exerted antitumor effects by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation, promoting apoptotic cell death, and inhibiting tumor cell proliferation, suggesting a multi-targeted mechanism of action. In conclusion, SAE and AgNPs-SAE demonstrate promising antitumor potential with fewer side effects than conventional chemotherapeutics like DOX. The enhanced efficacy of AgNPs-SAE underscores the advantage of combining phytochemicals with nanotechnology to develop safer and more effective cancer therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elattar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: