Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Corpus-assisted discourse analysis reveals how guidelines define sexual content, impacting marginalized communities.
Technical and professional communicators need to continue to interrogate how the seemingly mundane documents they create, such as terms of service (ToS) and community guidelines, and the systems those documents become a part of can oppress, exclude, and affect marginalized and hypermarginalized communities. This article presents an adapted corpus-assisted discourse analysis of how “sexual content” is defined across a corpus of 176 ToS and community guidelines from 118 social media sites. The findings show how ToS and community guidelines can work together to complicate our understanding of how values are intentionally and unintentionally embedded in these documents in order to uphold power or to meet emancipatory ends.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rachael Jordan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: