Key result
Higher S-wave amplitude is linked to ~166% greater odds of endothelial dysfunction in healthy young adults.
Why the study?
Early detection of endothelial dysfunction is important for preventing cardiovascular risk in young adults, prompting investigation into its relationship with electrocardiographic parameters.
Do routine electrocardiographic parameters predict endothelial dysfunction in young adults without chronic diseases?
Cross-Sectional (n=60)
No
Do routine electrocardiographic parameters predict endothelial dysfunction in young adults without chronic diseases?
Routine ECG parameters have limited prognostic value for detecting endothelial dysfunction in young adults, highlighting the need for biomarkers and flow-mediated dilation for early cardiovascular risk assessment.
Routine ECG should not yet screen for endothelial dysfunction in young adults; leaves open S-wave amplitude as hypothesis-generating, needing prospective validation.
Objective: Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is an early indicator of cardiovascular disease and plays a key role in the initiation of atherosclerosis. ED is characterized by decreased bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO), increased oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses, which trigger atherosclerotic plaque formation. Early detection of ED is important for preventing cardiovascular risk in young adults. This study aims to investigate the relationship between ED and electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters. Methods: Between January 2024 and June 2025, 60 patients aged 18–45 years without chronic disease who applied to the cardiology outpatient clinic were included in the study. Patients were divided into ED-positive (n=30) and ED-negative (n=30) groups according to NO, ICAM-1, malondialdehyde (MDA), and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) measurements. ED was defined as NO <10 µmol/L, ICAM-1 >10 ng/mL, MDA >1,500 ng/mL, and FMD <7%. Electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters were analyzed using a 12-lead ECG. Results: In the ED-positive group, NO levels were lower (4.8 vs. 5.0 µmol/L, p=0.438), ICAM-1 (10.2 vs. 6.5 ng/mL, p<0.001) and MDA (1796 vs. 305 ng/mL, p<0.001) were higher, and FMD was lower (6% vs. 10%, p<0.001). Among ECG parameters, only S-wave amplitude was higher in the ED-positive group (0.43 vs. 0.27 mV, p=0.004). Regression analysis showed that S-wave amplitude was an independent predictor of ED (odds ratio 2.662, 95% confidence interval 1.664–4.253, p<0.001). Conclusion: Biomarkers and FMD are superior to routine ECG in detecting ED. Only the S-wave amplitude was associated with ED, indicating the limited prognostic value of ECG. Biomarkers and FMD are recommended for early cardiovascular risk detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çamkıran et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Endothelial dysfunction (n=60). S-wave amplitude was the only routine electrocardiographic parameter independently associated with endothelial dysfunction in healthy young adults (OR 2.662).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: