Comparison of Dioptron Nova Refractive Data with Conventional Refractive Data

Refractive data obtained by means of the Dioptron Nova Diagnostic Eye Computer were compared to data obtained by conventional clinical refraction on a group of 236 clinic patients. Spherical equivalent power data were found to average −0.32 D more for Dioptron Nova data than for clinical data, whereas spherical power data averaged −0.25 D more for Dioptron Nova data than for clinical data, and cylinder power averaged −0.12 D more for Dioptron Nova data. Dioptron and clinical data were found to be within 0.50 D of each other for 74% of eyes for spherical equivalent power, for 83% of eyes for spherical power, and for 91% of eyes for cylinder power. Cylinder axis data were found to be within 10 degrees for the two methods for 78% of eyes.