Comparative perspectives enhance understanding of ethical responsibility in interdisciplinary research across cultures, suggesting new governance models.
This paper designs and explores the concept of situated ethical responsibility (SER) within interdisciplinary research ethics, drawing on comparative perspectives from Moldova, Japan, and France. The study highlights the limitations of universalised ethical codes, particularly in the context of cross-border collaborations and diverse disciplinary norms. By analysing 29 semi-structured interviews and participant observation conducted as part of the 101086224-HESPRI-HORIZON-MSCA-2021-SE-01 Project (HESPRI), the paper illustrates how ethical practices are negotiated within specific socio-cultural, historical, and institutional contexts. The findings reveal that ethical responsibility is not merely a matter of adhering to formal procedures but is a dynamic, relational practice embedded in everyday research activities. The concept of SER is proposed as a framework that valorises the richness of researchers’ backgrounds and experiences while addressing the complexities of interdisciplinary and cross-cultural collaborations. This approach underscores the need for governance models that transcend disciplinary silos and apply context-sensitive judgement to adequately reflect the realities of contemporary research environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caracentev et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: