Observational study finds visual field score and asymmetry detect glaucoma better than IOP measures, highlighting their value.
The visual fields and intraocular pressures (IOP's) of 115 normal volunteers and 107 suspect/diagnosed early glaucoma subjects were recorded by Friedmann static perimetry and noncontact tonometry or applanation tonometry. The visual field data were analyzed statistically and quantified numerically by a microcomputer. The readings obtained from the suspect/diagnosed early glaucoma subjects were compared to those from an age‐matched control group according to four criteria: (1) highest field score; (2) field score asymmetry; (3) highest IOP; and (4) IOP asymmetry. A combined field score and asymmetry analysis was found to be more sensitive, 86%, than a combined IOP and IOP asymmetry analysis, 56%. The combined field score and field score asymmetry analysis also gave a clear bimodal separation of subjects with early visual field defects from those with normal visual function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henson et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: