Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates a two-step regeneration method restoring catalyst activity in biomass gasification, highlighting implications for sustainable energy.
Catalytic hydrothermal gasification (cHTG) offers a sustainable pathway for converting wet biomass into methane, but long-term operation is hindered by catalyst deactivation, particularly due to coke deposition and sulfur poisoning. Ruthenium on activated carbon (Ru/AC) is highly active for methane production but gradually loses performance during continuous gasification of biomass or wastes. Conventional high-temperature oxidative regeneration methods, which rely on combustion to remove coke, are unsuitable for carbon supports due to their poor stability in the presence of oxidizing agents. Here, a low-temperature aqueous regeneration strategy was explored using hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) oxidation followed by subcritical water flushing. Effluent analysis and catalyst characterization reveal that coke is primarily oxidized and removed during H 2 O 2 oxidation (<120 °C), while sulfur species are oxidized to strongly adsorbed forms (sulfate) that require subsequent desorption via subcritical water flushing. Based on these insights, a two-step regeneration protocol was developed, consisting of two H 2 O 2 oxidation treatments (85–120 °C), each followed by subcritical water flushing (up to 320 °C). This approach achieves (97 ± 2) % sulfur removal while preserving carbon support integrity. The method enables efficient catalyst regeneration targeting both coking and sulfur fouling, offering a practical aqueous strategy to extend the operational lifetime of Ru/AC catalysts in cHTG and related catalytic systems without the need to remove the material from the catalytic reactor for regeneration. • Two-step aqueous regeneration restores Ruthenium catalyst activity. • Low-temperature H 2 O 2 oxidation removes coke and converts sulfur to oxidized forms. • Subcritical water flushing desorbs strongly bound sulfur species. • 97 ± 2% sulfur removal achieved without damaging carbon support. • Enables catalyst regeneration and lifetime extension without reactor disassembly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: