Shows enhanced hydrogen production in biomass-derived feedstocks, highlighting interfacial interactions.
This study demonstrates that electronically enriched Ru-centers significantly enhance hydrogen production via aqueous phase reforming (APR) of glycerol. Hydrotalcite-derived Ru-MMO catalysts with optimized Ru loading (1.2 wt%) exhibited superior catalytic activity, achieving glycerol conversion of 82.2% and H₂ selectivity of 83.5%, with a hydrogen production rate of 86.7 mmol g −1 h −1 . XPS and in situ DRIFTS analyses reveal that the synergistic interaction between Ru 0 and interfacial Ruδ + species plays a critical role in catalytic performance. The Ru δ+ sites facilitate CO adsorption and promote water–gas shift (WGS) activity, while surface hydroxyl groups assist in CO diffusion, preventing active site poisoning. The catalyst demonstrates good stability over 24 h with a slight decline in H₂ selectivity, attributed to strong metal-support interaction and controlled nanoparticle size. This work highlights the importance of interfacial electronic effects and catalyst design in enhancing hydrogen production from biomass-derived feedstocks. • Aqueous phase reforming of glycerol was studied using ruthenium-based mixed metal. • oxide catalysts (Ru-MMO) derived from hydrotalcites. • The catalyst 2Ru-MMO with 1.2% Ru content demonstrated outstanding stability and excellent catalytic performance towards the glycerol conversion (~82%) and H 2 selectivity (> 93%). • The XPS studies combined with the in situ DRIFT technique suggested that Ru 0 and the interfacial Ru δ+ sites in the catalysts are primarily responsible for the stable catalytic performance of the catalyst. • The interfacial Ru δ+ sites in the hydrotalcite matrix facilitate CO adsorption and simultaneously suppress the poisoning of active catalytic sites (Ru 0 ) in the catalysts. • The hydroxyl groups present at the surface of the catalysts are propitious for the diffusion of CO adsorbed on catalytic sites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gogoi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: