The paper reveals representability results in relation algebra using Monk algebras, addressing open problems.
In “Monk Algebras and Ramsey Theory,” J. Log. Algebr. Methods Program. (2022), Kramer and Maddux prove various representability results in furtherance of the goal of finding the smallest weakly representable but not representable relation algebra. They also pose many open problems. In the present paper, we address problems and issues raised by Kramer and Maddux. In particular, we prove that the algebra obtained by splitting the atoms of an n atom Monk algebra is representable for $$n=32$$ n = 32 and $$n=116$$ n = 116 , and hence Proposition 7 in Kramer-Maddux does not generalize. We answer Problem 1(3) in the negative: relation algebra 1311₁₃₁₆ 1311 1316 is not representable. Thus 1311₁₃₁₆ 1311 1316 is a good candidate for the smallest weakly representable but not representable relation algebra.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeremy F. Alm (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: